tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5799844244210823668.post7389240140041589278..comments2023-07-03T09:09:09.228-04:00Comments on Monitoring University Governance: Informal Notes of August 14, 2012 Senate Council MeetingLarry Catá Backerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06545101367530775497noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5799844244210823668.post-75574905013723404752012-08-31T20:19:59.923-04:002012-08-31T20:19:59.923-04:00Thank you for posting my comments. This is a serio...Thank you for posting my comments. This is a serious matter to me. I truly believe that a mistake was made in the mix up of the two seperate incidents. There was only one incident in 2001 concerning Paterno, McQueary and the shower room. I was there when it happened. The Sandusky incident was a different date, probably 2002- march. Information from the 2001 incident could only be obtained from the journal of Coach Paterno.Don NewCT Shirtshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18116078715688733693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5799844244210823668.post-22596272718003829462012-08-27T14:31:07.964-04:002012-08-27T14:31:07.964-04:00Ultimately, this is what I believe: I believe that...Ultimately, this is what I believe: I believe that information that paterno wrote in his journal concerning the (sounds heard) incident, was found and used by investigators to make Sandusky and Penn State seem guilty . <br />It would be easy for someone to be mistaken about information that came from two such simular incidents. I think that is what happened.<br />The fact that (sounds heard) of a sexual assult before McQueary walked into the shower room, seeing Sandusky, was mentioned in court, basically confirms that the prosecutors had some evidence to that effect. But, they didn't get that information from Mcqueary. McQueary deneied hearing any sounds, like the sounds reported to Paterno in the sounds incident, before he entered the shower.<br />If information gathered about another, completely different incident, was used as evidence in the Sandusky investigation , I suppose that is where the mistake was made. If, it was just a mistake. If it wasn't.......<br /> Don NewCT Shirtshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18116078715688733693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5799844244210823668.post-72434060542497863092012-08-27T14:12:13.186-04:002012-08-27T14:12:13.186-04:00First, the investigators said the Sandusky inciden...First, the investigators said the Sandusky incident was in 2002. Then they said 2001. I was going on the change in the dates. I took it for granted that the information on the incident in 2001 was mistaken for the Sandusky incident. Although I can't be certain that the Sandusky incident happened in 2002 I have no other information about the date. The entry in Paterno's journal concerning McQueary telling him he heard sounds coming from the shower was in 2001. As far as I know there was no other recorded information on that incident in 2001 except what was written in Paterno's journal. There was also a typewritten page that had notes on the incident. Don NewCT Shirtshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18116078715688733693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5799844244210823668.post-207861298546810122012-08-23T23:46:25.310-04:002012-08-23T23:46:25.310-04:00http://don-robbinsscience-religion.blogspot.com/
d...http://don-robbinsscience-religion.blogspot.com/<br />donrobbins4@gmail.comDon NewCT Shirtshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18116078715688733693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5799844244210823668.post-27695991312983032292012-08-23T23:44:20.660-04:002012-08-23T23:44:20.660-04:00Where did the grand jury investigators get the inf...Where did the grand jury investigators get the information concerning the sounds of a sexual assault coming from the shower room at Penn State, in 2001?<br /><br /> There was no record of the incident, except in Paterno's private journal.<br /><br /> The incident did not concern Sandusky. <br /><br /> The Sandusky incident was a completely different incident. There were no reports of sounds of a sexual encounter, or assault, concerning the Sandusky incident. The Grand Jury had information that was gathered concerning the other incident, where we heard sounds and said it was the Sandusky incident.<br /><br /> It made it sound like there were sounds of a sexual nature, possibly an assault, right before McQueary walked into the shower and saw Sandusky with a child.<br />Don NewCT Shirtshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18116078715688733693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5799844244210823668.post-86045711092237468302012-08-20T22:56:09.823-04:002012-08-20T22:56:09.823-04:00Joe Paterno's Private Journal. The notes on...Joe Paterno's Private Journal. The notes on the incident in 2001 contained in the private journal of Joe Paterno, that stated, that McQueary heard sounds of sexual assault coming from the shower room, were in the journal, because I advised Mr. Paterno to make a note of the incident. The sounds in 2001 not 2002.<br />McQueary saw Sandusky in the shower room in 2002 not 2001. McQueary testified that he didn't hear any sounds, of that nature, the night he walked into the shower room in 2002. <br />The Grand Jury made it sound like the sexual assault sounds came at the same time that McQueary walked into the shower room. They convinced people that the sounds went along with the incident, but the two incidents were a year apart.<br />This action made Sandusky seem more guilty.<br />Don NewCT Shirtshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18116078715688733693noreply@blogger.com